What Is Adequate? Operationalizing the Concept of Adequacy for New York

نویسنده

  • Thomas Downes
چکیده

In New York, as in a number of other states in which recent state court decisions have invalidated the existing system of school financing, the court decision has focused on the failure of the existing system to provide each student with an adequate (“a sound, basic”) education. While the legal strategies that have led to these decisions have been prompted, in part, by longstanding discussions in the research literature on how to best design intergovernmental aid systems, there is no consensus in the literature on how to operationalize the concept of adequacy. The court decisions do not give policy makers the luxury of waiting for consensus in the academic literature; they must settle on a method for structuring an aid system that insures that each student has access to an adequate education. This paper will attempt to provide with some guidance on how to accomplish this difficult task. The starting point will be a working definition of adequacy. The paper will then provide a critical evaluation of methods that have been proposed for determining the spending districts in a state would need if they are to provide an adequate education. Particular attention will be paid to the lessons that can be learned from the efforts in other states and in New York to operationalize the concept of adequacy. The ultimate goal of this discussion is to suggest how existing methodologies could be combined to produce a defensible, replicable, and understandable method for determining adequacy. The paper will then turn to several cross-cutting issues that must be addressed no matter which method is used to determine the adequate level of spending in each district. Among these issues will be the possibility of creating perverse incentives by compensating for factors in that can be influenced by districts and the need for avoiding a system of adequacy determination that appears to dictate to districts and schools specific input mixes. Particular attention will also be paid to the need for updating, to account for advances in research, for changes in standards, and for the availability of new or better data. Operationalizing the concept of adequacy for New York State 2

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Facing the Challenge of Generic Hybridity in EAP Research and Pedagogy

Since its introduction to EAP theory in the 1980s, the concept of genre has proven to be a rigorous theoretical construct for a deeperunderstanding of the nature of academic discourse. However, the inherent potential of this concept as a means of classifying and categorizing academic texts has also given rise to what we have called “the misconception of homogeneity”. Criticizing this misconcept...

متن کامل

Meeting the Challenge of Diabetes in China

China’s estimated 114 million people with diabetes pose a massive challenge for China’s health policy-makers who have significantly extended health insurance coverage over the past decade. What China is doing now, what it has achieved, and what remains to be done should be of interest to health policy-makers, worldwide. We identify the challenges posed by China’s two pr...

متن کامل

Reflection on Foreign Arbitratral Award from the Perspective of United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York 1958)

The Convention of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral, New York 1958, is a comprehensive instrument which facilitates the enforcement of decisions of arbitration body. In accordance to Article 1, the convention can be applied on a State other than the State where the recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought, or can be applied to arbitral awards not considered as domesti...

متن کامل

Integrated Care: A Pill for All Ills?

There is an increasing policy emphasis on the integration of care, both within the healthcare sector and also between the health and social care sectors, with the simple aim of ensuring that individuals get the right care, in the right place, at the right time. However, implementing this simple aim is rather more complex. In this editorial, we seek to make sense of this complexity and ask: what...

متن کامل

Using the Taxonomy and the Metrics: What to Study When and Why; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”

Dukhanin and colleagues’ taxonomy of metrics for patient engagement at the organizational and system levels has great potential for supporting more careful and useful evaluations of this ever-growing phenomenon. This commentary highlights the central importance to the taxonomy of metrics assessing the extent of meaningful participation in decision-making by patients, consumers and community mem...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004